and made fun (sorta) of the dude who wrote the book “too high to fail”
fascinating conversation for two reasons
first they’re all very smart people speaking from facts and logic instead of ideology and fear
second, their isnt anyone on the four-person panel with an opposing view
traditionally in journalism you try to have a “balanced” panel to get both sides.
but often such dynamics cancel each other out as the conversation cant lift off the ground
here, the discussion elevates as people compliment (and gently diss) each other
and take it to the next level with each statement.